The Port Book
Policy & disputes

Russia's WTO Challenge to EU Carbon Levy Triggers Panel

A WTO dispute panel will examine Russia's claims that the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism and emissions trading scheme violate trade rules, with

A WTO dispute panel will examine Russia's claims that the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism and emissions trading...

Russia has formally requested a WTO dispute panel to examine its claims that the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism and emissions trading scheme violate international trade rules. The World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body agreed on September 25 to Russia's second request to establish a panel to review its challenge against the European Union's carbon levy on imports.

The Russian Federation argues the CBAM package creates significant trade barriers for covered goods imported into the EU. It also contends that the EU's allocation of allowances under its Emissions Trading Scheme constitutes an export subsidy, strengthening the competitive position of European producers. The mechanism imposes a carbon levy on certain imported goods to align their cost with the emissions costs borne by European producers, aiming to protect EU industry from cheaper imports from countries with less stringent climate requirements.

EU defends carbon measures amid geopolitical tensions

The European Union maintains its climate policies comply with WTO rules. It stated it would participate in the proceedings to reaffirm its support for the rules-based multilateral trading system and expressed confidence that both the CBAM and ETS are consistent with WTO rules.

The EU objected to Russia's request, stating it was extraordinary that Russia, which continues its war of aggression against Ukraine, was seeking to rely on international law to improve export access to the EU market. This panel request follows an earlier procedural step where the EU objected to Russia's first request at a DSB meeting on 24 July. Russia had previously requested the establishment of a panel in July, but the request was not granted at that time.

Global stakeholders prepare for expanded dispute proceedings

A broad group of WTO members has reserved third-party rights to participate in the proceedings. This group includes major economies such as Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Malaysia, Norway, Paraguay, Singapore, Switzerland, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Over 20 members reiterated support for the joint proposal and the urgent need to restore a fully functioning dispute settlement system. Several members encouraged participation in the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement, noting Cambodia as the newest member to join that arrangement.

WTO dispute system faces simultaneous reform pressures

The panel announcement occurs during intense debate over Appellate Body vacancies and broader dispute settlement reform efforts. Colombia, speaking on behalf of 130 members, introduced for the 100th time a proposal to start the selection processes for filling vacancies on the Appellate Body. Colombia regretted that members had not been able to launch the selection processes for the Appellate Body for the 100th occasion.

The United States stated it does not support the proposed decision and reiterated its fundamental concerns on WTO dispute settlement, stating the proposal does not address those concerns. The DSB Chair, Ambassador Guilherme de Aguiar Patriota of Brazil, said members broadly supported information sessions to preserve institutional memory on dispute settlement reform, with the first session held on 25 September.

Separately, the DSB agreed to delay consideration of the panel report in the Trkiye case until 27 October 2026, as requested by China and Trkiye. The next regular DSB meeting will take place on 27 October 2026. Status reports were presented by the United States, the European Union, and Indonesia on various other ongoing disputes.

The WTO panel will hear Russia's challenge to the EU carbon border levy.

Related coverage

More from Policy & disputes